In my opinion, appeasement was the right policy for Britain in 1938. He most likely hoped that Germany would stop and he wouldn't be the Prime minister in office during the second world war. While the countries of this region were equally anxious, their interests rested elsewhere--unrestricted barter of agricultural products for that of German manufactured goods. Hitler's Appeasement was a policy of concessions accorded to Naziregime in Germany by the British government under NevilleChamberlain and allies. Britain also had Economic concerns and a fear that if Nazism was defeated then communism would fill the gap.
Although in hindsight, war could have been prevented should the countries were more united and mobilised their armies to stop Germany's invasion of czechoslovakia. Consequently Stalin signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact with Hitler in 1939. All of these factors explain how the appeasement was justified. This policy was supposed to prevent war from happening, but war happened anyways. Yes Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938.
They knew that they had tried everything to stop war and the only thing left was to fight, which united the country to fight and defend the nation. With appeasement, the French, Dutch and English would have been strong enough that the Japanese would never have attempted to expand into those nations colonial possessions. All this, together with the later pressure over Poland to surrender Danzig, showed that Britain is ready to sacrifice any country except from itself, just to satisfy Hitler and ensure its security. He could not go to war without the support of the people — and until 1939 most people wanted peace, almost at any price. After reading and annotating the documents, you will compose a thoughtful well-written response to the central question which will be submitted as a shared Google Doc link.
Another reason is that the British were low on morale and did not want to go to war. Germany pursued the narrative that they were fighting against communism when they aid the Spanish Nationalist Forces. Despite this common explanation, there is another possibility. And it usually takes agreement among many on what the plan of action will be. Marijuana activists claim that the drug has no bad lasting side effects, but I disagree with that, due to it being a gateway drug for young adults in high school experimenting with drugs and alcohol.
Remember you must explain in 2-3 sentences how each piece of evidence you use supports your thesis statement. It is necessary to look at other main reasons such as; the rise of dictatorships, Hitler and Mussolini being the most crucial, economic concerns about the effect of the wall street crash and war debts, the attitudes towards the Paris Peace Settlement, concerns over the British Empire, military weakness, the fear of communism and the lack of reliable allies. This gave them clip to fix for war since it is inevitable anyways. The extra 6 months provided because of the appeasement policy allowed not just Britain but other Allied countries to prepare for war. Britain exercised a policy of appeasement with Hitler becauseinitially, his demands were reasonable. When was it created or written? Standard A: Cognition and Understanding. Germany and Soviet union Yes, appeasement of the Axis powers was the right policy for Britain in 1938.
A fear of resorting to any sort of violence or armed conflict. Look into this, its pretty interesting. Another justification was because Britain did not have the Financial Resources to launch another war. As it happened Germany took what was offered, ignored their agreements and went to War. You will develop a claim, using evidence, to answer the question: Was appeasement the right policy for England in 1938? In my opinion, appeasement was the right policy.
A strong Germany can indeed serve as a buffer to the spread of Communism, but after the Franco-Soviet pact put Germany in a position where it was against both the Eastern and Western European powers. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. However, since they did not know what Hitler was going to do, they were right to try appeasement to try to avoid starting a war. There are a number of reasons that support both of the sides. Thus appeasement was the right policy for Britain as it did not deteriorate Britain's morale as quick when compared to the point where Britain went to war straight away.
Hitler had to delay his plans to destroy communism and fight the western powers. Hitler blatantly violated the Treaty of Versailles, had an Anschluss with Austria which clearly showed that Hitler's interests was in the expansion and strengthening of Germany and re-militarized which was clearly a challenge to Britain's position in Europe. After World War One there was an almost universal desire for lasting peace. Appeasement was a reversion to and an extension of traditional British foreign policy and diplomatic negotiations. The appeasement policy was the right and one of the best policy in 1938. But, I completely understand why Britain tried appeasement first. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done.
Big part takes the national self-interest, showed by all the big powers, especially by Britain. Of course, communism pre-dates the Russian Revolution. In the first place, Chamberlain should not have gone as himself, but as the Prime Minister of Britain. Facts and illustrations are either absent. The other group thought that Nazi Germany presented a greater threat. As a matter of fact the British thought that the treaty of Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany.
Topic: Was Appeasement The Right Policy Essay — … Politicians often attribute the world war and the Holocaust to Neville Chamberlains appeasement of Hitlers annexation of former German speaking regions. And as a consequence the British gave away on many things that Hitler desired, even when going against treaty of Versailles. This is because first of all, Hitler was not a man you could appease. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would shortly be satisfied after remilitarising the Rhineland. It was also the best policy for them because at the point of time, if Britain had went to war, she would have lost the war.