In adult courts judges have fewer choices, and sometimes the only option to choose is prison. The stranger fed him and kept him in his house. One could argue that because juveniles know they can get away with crime because they are under a certain age, they are more willing to commit the crime. What matters the most is for justice to be served how its supposed to be. Those who do not agree with trying juveniles as adults point to this fact and urge lawmakers not to throw the book at a child who may have made a one time only mistake.
Minors should be tried as adults because they made the same mistakes as adults. And therefore, feeling remorse may not always be possible. I once attended the sentencing of a teenager — Clarence — who had killed a woman — Pauline — who sang in my choir. After Alonza ran away he met this man that said he can stay with him for a couple days. They know what they are doing and they know there consequences for their actions. These are the people who help society — the ones who obey the law.
There are far too many instances where race and location decide whether or not someone is tried as an adult. The creation of the juvenile system aimed at providing rehabilitation services for minor offenders who commit crimes such as vandalism, stealing and shoplifting among others and according to Forensic Psychologist Andrew Day, it works. Not only do they automatically have immunity to the death penalty, but they will be, at most, detained for a small period of time. Paraphrase: The Pro side argues that a crime is a crime, no matter what the age is. The trial phase of a juvenile case is an adjudication hearing. Should juveniles be tried as adults? Many of them begin thinking and acting more maturely.
Recent high-profile cases involving teens, such as the case of 17-year-old Washington, D. Opponents of trying juveniles as adults argue that juvenile criminals should not be put in adult prisons nor be treated as them as they are likely to be mistreated and abused, which is a good argument. When a teenager commits such a crime such as murder they must be tried, and they should not be treated with leniency and coddling, but with the full force of the law as an adult. Because adolescents are physically incapable of making mature, responsible, well-processed decisions; and this isn't just because of lack of inexperience in life. Simmons, the court abolished capital punishment for crimes committed by juveniles. The Illinois Juvenile Court Act of 1899 was the first juvenile court established in the United States Locked Up…. Kids today are far more intelligent 5yrs.
When Alonza got caught, he was charged up to thirteen years in an adult prison. The court determined that such harsh sentencing of kids constituted cruel and unusual punishment, a decision that overturned mandatory sentencing policies in 28 states. In this case its difference maybe he should have been this punished so harshly but in the end he commited a cry it was a bad situation he was in but there were so mant different ways he could have handled it. Juveniles deserve to be tried the same as adults when they commit certain crimes. A similar concept gets carried onto this issue as well.
It was also discovered that young adults are now being used by adults to commit crimes on their behalf. Go here forfor using Do Now, using , and using other. Some may argue that they are influenced by their elders, and not necessarily brought up the right way knowing right from wrong, but any person over the age of 12-13, able to; in this case, handle a gun is for sure able to know how to comprehend the difference between right and wrong. Minors will be put at risk Similar to the concern of the lawyer and families of the Wisconsin girls, young offenders are at risk of being sent to an adult correctional facility if they are tried in an adult court. There are different circumstances to every crime, and the Affirmative position is too narrow-minded to see that. Children can be questioned without parental consent or presence.
He, who celebrated his sixteenth birthday in jail, faces up to 110 years behind bars for second-degree attempted murder and use of a weapon to commit a felony. Lear clearly wants us to come to the conclusion that it is not the shooters who should be punished. If an adult and teen commit the same crime, they should be trialed the same. To learn more about probable cause, see Nolo's. .
Trying children as adults has the effect of lowering the overall rate of crime and allowing us to live in a much safer society. The problem with these punishments, however, is that they effectively take away a valuable lesson that a juvenile is supposed to learn while serving the terms of his sentence. There are a lot of pros and cons that this issue holds, as is clearly seen in the points that have been put forth. Instead the judge makes all of the decisions, often with the help of a team of mediators for the children and their families. In 2004 in Roper v. Unfortunately, it is not that simple. That is no place for a kid; they could be put into serious harm.