Should college athletes be paid cons. Should College Athletes be Paid: Pros & Cons 2019-01-27

Should college athletes be paid cons Rating: 4,6/10 1510 reviews

The Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes

should college athletes be paid cons

Many of these universities fall far from the top 10 colleges in the world or even the country. The University of Colorado admitted in 2004 that it used to lure prospective student athletes into signing with the school. I'm an active high school student involved with extracurricular activities such as soccer, basketball, and track. In the form of scholarships. The student athletes are not permitted to have jobs during the school year. Don't worry, we don't spam. That, in turn, can deprive other students of their chance to gain the education and experience at the college of their dreams, since their desired program will no longer be offered,.

Next

Should College Athletes Be Paid?

should college athletes be paid cons

This graphic also supports my argument of why college athletes should not be paid. If they had to begin paying players, other programs would likely suffer as a result. Its coaches and administrators make staggering amounts of money. It is unfair to us non-athletic students to offer college players a salary for being part of a team. College sporting events bring in money through tickets, jerseys, shirts, and other gear.

Next

Should College Athletes Get Paid Pros and Cons List

should college athletes be paid cons

So they think that student athletes just need to work hard and remain patient for their future rewards. A small salary would also teach student-athletes. Safely assuming that any pay-for-play plan would include paying male football and basketball players, you run into huge issues with federal law. Many of these athletes come from urban, low-class families and often leave school early because of the unimaginable pressure to be the main provider for their family at a young age. Or should they be compensated for the hard work and team spirit they provide for the college lucky enough to have them? Finally, the long, drawn-out debate of paying college athletes comes down to the ethics of it. While not all student-athletes are on scholarship, many are, particularly those who are playing for schools we see winning national championships.

Next

Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes

should college athletes be paid cons

This would benefit everyone involved. The organization argues that student athletes are provided with full scholarships and a free education. With proper funds, athletes would be able to afford decent meals and other daily living expenses; they could possibly even send money back home to help family as well. There are many benefits and disadvantages to paying them, and this debate is sure to rage on for some time to come. A Possible Solution All kinds of ideas have been floated for addressing the heated issue of college athlete compensation. It is a full impact sport that results in full impact injuries. At the end of the day, they may be significantly worse off under a salary model than they are under the scholarship model.


Next

7 Most Notable Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes

should college athletes be paid cons

Photo Courtesy: Becca Wyant The Breakdown So, what exactly does it mean to pay college athletes? Except these, minority sports are not promoted to a large extent. College games are still a favorite national past-time of most Americans, who love to spend their weekends enjoying some hours of baseball or American football games. Other questions include how much should students-athletes be paid, how often, will it work in a similar way that professional contracts work, etc? But that's like telling someone to keep providing a valuable service for free or low pay because they'll win the lottery as soon as their contract expires. Early on in the day, he admonished college athletic departments for relying on direct institutional support and state government subsidies in order to operate in the black. This means that if the N. The next year, they may transfer to another school with an even higher offer.

Next

Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid

should college athletes be paid cons

Not only would it take away from the passion that college athletes play with today, but I feel it would be unfair to the non-student athletes. There are so many ways our sport can contribute to a flourishing collegiate environment. Why do college athletes that put in just as much work get paid differently? The top playing Division I schools contribute more to this figure than many of the lowest members combined. Still, colleges and universities use their athletic success to promote their school and entice potential applicants. So, where is the money supposed to come from to pay these athletes? It seems the conversation is here to stay. Not just a regular issue at that, but a structurally racial issue on many levels.

Next

Should College Student

should college athletes be paid cons

Here, as per our interest, it is sports. So they don't play sports so much for the joy as for the desperate need to climb out of poverty and help their families. College Athletes Spend an Average of 43. Paying college athletes opens the world up to a brand new slate of lawsuits as it is virtually impossible to have an across the board pay scale. Who decides a fair yet competitive rate to pay? Whether student-athletes should be paid is an ongoing debate often brought up during championship seasons, especially the college football playoffs and the basketball post-season. These scholarships can cover a number of different items, such as tuition fees, room and board and course-related books.

Next

Paying College Athletes Pros and Cons List

should college athletes be paid cons

Other schools that have been confirmed to be among the 14: , , and. As an athlete, it can be very tempting to accept those offers, especially if you've had a disadvantaged upbringing. Sometimes, money is actually to fund sports. In those cases, an athlete can have his or her scholarship withdrawn or non-renewed after suffering a catastrophic injury or being cut from a team. The athletes do not garner… 1061 Words 5 Pages College sports also known as the greatest source of entertainment known to man this era. Even so, an argument can be made that players in those sports deserve more compensation since it is their performances that help pay for huge coaching salaries, lavish facilities, and less-prominent sports at their schools. Pros of Paying College Athletes 1.


Next

7 Most Notable Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes

should college athletes be paid cons

For students who work 90 hour weeks for four or five years, the burn out at the end of the road can be difficult and damaging. What about the top level talent? Before you decide which side to take, it is best to know the pros and cons. Last Wednesday, Louisville legendary coach Rick Pitino and placed Athletic Director Tom Jurich on paid leave. As seen above, only a portion of college athletic departments would really be able to pay their athletes. College sports is business, and a pretty booming one at that. That means limiting the number of hours required for training, practicing, and competing to something much more reasonable—perhaps a maximum of 20 hours per week instead of 40. Merit can be found in both arguments; however, the changes that would be necessary to put the payment practice into place would take years to implement.

Next