The main grievances include among others, elitism within political parties and governments, disregard for the opinions and job needs of citizens, outright corruption in some cases, and promotion of policies, which increase inequality through the blatant transfer of wealth from the middle and poorer sectors to elites. Here are the Pros of a Representative Democracy 1. Before the vote, Switzerland had the astonishing number of four minarets, which are still legal even under new law. It can easily devolve into gridlock. What do you feel the advantages and disadvantages of a representative democracy happen to be? Under the current representative structure of the United States, each state is awarded two senators and a delegation of representatives that are based on the population levels. And they have time to hear a range of viewpoints and carefully consider the consequences of new laws. That could be over 4,000 miles away.
Even if the minorities are oppressed, it is essentially the role of the state to make sure they are provided security, along with their basic rights as well as equal opportunity in all spheres of life. At the time of elections political parties propose their policy and programme in support of their candidates. In a democracy, everyone's opinion should be equal, because there are no right or wrong beliefs about how society should work. All in all, the direct democracy system in Switzerland has played a role in turning one of the poorest countries in Europe with hardly any natural resources into one of the wealthiest and most progressive. Direct democracy may work very well among a small group of people, but the larger the group the more difficult it is to run effectively.
In it, every citizen is allowed to take part, whereas everybody is not fit for it. Yet, because the government rules from the majority, that is the course of action that is taken. There are numerous instances in U. In a voting system, majority wins, and there is no distinction between the votes cast by the literate and the illiterate. Thus, morality is the first casualty in election. Also, it would be more difficult to reach a consensus among small groups of elected officials, more so in the entire population. They are just as susceptable to populist nonsense as anyone else.
There may not be right and wrong answers to political questions, but there are certainly more and less informed ones. They will just need to put their faith and trust on their elected representative. They will remain the minority on every decision being processed, no matter what. Many politicians will offer blanket promises to the general public to gain enough votes to win. In short: representatives represent no one but themselves and their own interests. Due to the fact that the government is bound by an election term where parties compete to regain authority, democracy prevents monopoly of the ruling authority. All of these elected officials supposedly listen to the populace and do what's best for the nation, state or jurisdiction as a whole.
This was an early form of the next evolution of democracy, called representative democracy. In a representative democracy, minority groups are only given enough air time to have their issues heard so that a vote can be obtained. The following arguments have been given in favour of Democracy: i Safeguards the interests of the people: Chief merit of democracy lies in that it safeguards the interests of the people. This is not difficult to imagine happening, if for example, the country would suddenly change its style of voting. What is a representative democracy? This self-interest is perfectly natural, but if a law that benefits a smaller group does not benefit a larger group for example, the protection of minority interests then that law is not likely to be passed. For a representative democracy to work, there are several conditions that have to be met. Perhaps, they are reluctant to do it or are just less aware about the impact of their votes.
Great Britain Great Britain, on the other hand, practices a form of parliamentary democracy, which in many ways is similar to the U. This has caused some groups to call for almost all federal powers to be handed over to states, and even a select few suggesting that the nation do away with the federal government all together, citing that they cannot possibly represent all citizens. There are other forms of government, however, that are even cheaper than this one. Because the power of the people is typically over after the vote takes place in a representative democracy, it encourages officials to be deceptive. The coalition of political parties with a view of sharing power is only a marriage of convenience. It cares a fig for the common man.
Pros of a Representative Democracy Representative democracies are, by definition, more practical for larger nations than direct democracy; electing a person to stand for a larger group of citizens means that the system doesn't have to deal with the many and considerable issues in arranging votes for the entire voting population. Every assignment would be forced through a rigorous approval method that involved everyone. Disadvantages of Direct Democracy 1. Final Thought Like any other form of government, direct democracy can certainly bring about changes in a certain country one way or another. That means larger states are allowed to elect more representatives to the House than smaller states. I personally believe that Direct Democracy is the way to go. Generally, democracy is based on the rule of equality, which means that all people are equal as far as the law is concerned.
Another thing is Direct Democracy has to be taken to the lowest analytical level. The Majority Rules The election process of representative government focuses solely on the majority. However, if the public wish something to be made law or a certain policy to be seen through, but that it would be truly detrimental to the country, it must be stopped by the government. Since this type of political system provides greater public involvement, difficulties in decision-making can be always observed, which is evident when the government uses decisions that come from the least-equipped citizens, who do not even know what the issues are all about. The net result is that we get plutocracy under the garb of democracy-democracy in name and form, plutocracy in reality.
It gives people the opportunity to get access to necessary information for them to clearly and widely understand issues within the government and its laws, bringing about transparency and allowing the citizens to informatively discuss political issues due to their involvement. In this kind of government, there are different elements that exist within the United States as well as other countries in the world. Although some politicians serve their own needs, this form of government solves the issue that was such a problem for the colonies before the Revolutionary War. Locke calls it the act of running administration by the ignorant. So, when there is something that they find unfavorable or is not implemented properly, they can make a stand and let their representatives act on it.
It is said that social, economic and political interests of the individuals are served better under this system. List of Advantages of Direct Democracy 1. Each keeps the other in check because no single branch of government can wield all the power. In fact, representative democracy is poor quality democracy because time and again the politicians betray voters. This type of government has its fair share of proponents and opponents. It allows me to be part of the political process and gives me a bigger say about things even though I do not identify with any specific political party. In a representative democracy, people can choose to vote or choose not to vote.